tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post9017316628184239843..comments2008-05-17T16:57:01.901+10:00michael jensenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15379361601019023165noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post-5115871830593745222008-05-17T16:57:00.000+10:002008-05-17T16:57:00.000+10:00Well if you want to footnote a pope, according to the Oxford Reference Dictionary for Papistry (3rd Ed), the correct way is thus:<BR/>Pope John Paul II, Ap. Letter Vicesimus quintus annus, 4 December 1988, n. 3: AAS 81 (1989) p. 899. (for example)<BR/>Now if you want to Quote a Pope, that's a different matter....Edmonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post-1568137771083303252008-05-17T08:39:00.000+10:002008-05-17T08:39:00.000+10:00<I>Presumably the same as you'd do for Augustine of Hippo</I>.<BR/><BR/>Now there's a phrase we don't use nearly enough.Benwww.bathgates.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post-10505134643273961912008-05-16T20:17:00.000+10:002008-05-16T20:17:00.000+10:00Presumably exactly the same as you'd do for Augustine of HippoCustard.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02487495921222083129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post-64060060953125361092008-05-16T20:05:00.000+10:002008-05-16T20:05:00.000+10:00Ah, yes, that works for the footnotes, but in the bibliography it cites him as <BR/><BR/>Paul II, John<BR/><BR/>and for Benedict XVI you get<BR/><BR/>XVI, Benedict.michael jensenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15379361601019023165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14789283.post-39025736694031339952008-05-16T20:02:00.000+10:002008-05-16T20:02:00.000+10:00Michael,<BR/><BR/>Paul II, JohnJason Goroncyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05154964644305013639noreply@blogger.com