This book represents a landmark in genuinely reformed evangelical thinking about the theological task.
Kevin J. Vanhoozer, who is currently Research Professor of Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, is well known for his work on questions of fundamental theology (First Theology) and hermeneutics (Is There A Meaning in This Text?). As usual, in The Drama of Doctrine he manages to combine real creativity and a remarkable knowledge of contemporary debates with faithfulness to conservative evangelical orthodoxy – which ultimately of course means faithfulness to the scriptures themselves.
This work is occasioned by the calcification of contemporary evangelical theology and the unwillingness of church pastors to pay any attention to it at all out of suspicion and/or boredom. In answer to serious cultural, intellectual and theological challenges, evangelical theological voices have certainly been more loudly raised; but they have not been persuasive in the debate or attuned to the pastor’s weekly task of proclaiming the gospel to contemporary people. Evangelical scholars have either retreated further into fortress of Enlightenment rationalism (Carl Henry, Wayne Grudem) or given craven concession to postmodernism (Stanley Grenz). The situation into which The Drama of Doctrine is written calls for a reinvigoration of the theological task in a way which avoids both of these dire pitfalls.
The purpose of this work is to present Vanhoozer’s vision of a ‘canonical-linguistic’ theology organized around the metaphor of dramatic performance. Doctrine is not merely a set of flat propositions, but rather a dramatic direction to be performed by Christians, individually and collectively. That is to say, it is a gospel to be lived! The exposition of his theme falls into four parts. In the first, “The Drama”, Vanhoozer shows how theology responds and corresponds to the words and deeds of God and serves as ‘direction for the church’s fitting participation in the drama of redemption’ (p. 31). It is rooted in the gospel itself as its first premise. Second (“The Script”), Vanhoozer addresses the place of Scripture and tradition and how they should relate. Against the post-liberals who make scripture merely subject to the church, he wishes to affirm sola scriptura. However, he is receptive to the insight that these doctrines of scripture do describe and prescribe ecclesial practices of scriptural reading. This is the real strength of the book, in this reviewer’s opinion: Vanhoozer has offered a way forward from the intractable battles about the doctrine of scripture without conceding its constitutive and authoritative place for the church’s life. Here is at last an evangelical doctrine of scripture which does not ignore ecclesiology. With John Webster, Vanhoozer also argues that Scripture has less an epistemological than a soteriological function.
Part III (“The Dramaturge”) fleshes out the role of the theologian in the ‘canonical-linguistic’ approach to theology following the theatrical model. Vanhoozer coins the term ‘post-conservative’, a move which nods to the emphasis on communal practices in post-liberalism and yet preserves an authoritative canonical script. The theologian engages in both practices of scientia in interpreting scripture and sapientia in reading and engaging with the contemporary cultural context. The aim of the theology is to enable Christians to better ‘perform’ the Christian life as disciples of Jesus by ‘improvising’ on the script(ures). Vanhoozer here proposes a move beyond both propositionalism and foundationalism in theological method while affirming the place of propositions and foundations as necessary to theology.
The fourth part (“The Performance”) extrapolates the task of theology in its congregational and pastoral setting, using the doctrine of the atonement as a case study. Doctrine is something that we are invited to live out in the church and the world: “The direction of doctrine…enables us…to render the gospel public by leading lives in creative imitation of Christ” (p. 32). One of Vanhoozer’s favourite themes – martyrdom – here emerges as a disturbing sign to the church of what imitating Christ might mean. It is a rare piece of systematic theology that can address the Christian walk so concretely. Under this schema, and with his ears attuned to postmodern currents, he is able to emphasise the need for action without losing the theological reason for it. Doctrine and ethics flow seamlessly together - as of course they should.
Some features of the book serve to dampen my overall enthusiasm. First: the guiding metaphor of ‘drama’ is a well chosen development on the insights of narrative theology; but it does at points feel stretched further than it will go. In particular, the pastor as ‘director’ (Part IV) feels like a poorly chosen equivalence and smacks somewhat of clericalism. Surely it is the Spirit who directs the church. Second, Vanhoozer’s incessant quotation of other authors impedes the smooth flow of his text; and at times appears forced. He seeks congruity in quotes but not in arguments; but when he quotes someone – say, Geoffrey Wainwright on the role of the sacraments (p. 412) - who is diametrically opposed to his conclusions, it is less than convincing as an appeal to authority. Third, Vanhoozer tends to state rather than argue his case. He articulates his point with great clarity and even aesthetic flair. This is a deliberate and self-consciouslessly postmodern strategy of depending on the explanatory power of the ideas themselves to convince his readers rather than leaning on some evidence external to the subject matter. With that I have much sympathy: however, this reader felt that there may have been more for Vanhoozer to offer by way of argument. I am surprised he spends so little time, for example, on showing how the scriptures themselves demonstrate his case by presenting a word that demands performance from its readers.
However, these shortcomings should not deter potential readers. This is a courageous and timely book that exemplifies theology taking mission seriously; and should be read by pastors, students and teachers who are like-minded. Vanhoozer does not ignore or side-step the toughest questions of postmodernism. Most salutary is the call of this book for the churches to renew our communal practices. Vanhoozer shows what an evangelical theologian can achieve if he or she is truly attentive to the task of serving the church. His vision is to recapture the reformed vision of deep theological reflection as belonging to pastors and lay people, not the preserve of the academy. Here is no brittle orthodoxy; rather, we have in The Drama of Doctrine an imaginative reiteration of evangelical truth.
10 comments:
Nice review, I have not read any of Vanhoozer's books, only a couple of essays, but he seems a very sharp and insightful thinker.
From what I understand, 'Is there a meaning in this text?' is a theological/philosophical work discussing hermeneutical issue that shape the way we read texts, particularly the Bible.
Is 'The Drama of Doctrine' more of the same or is it taking the lessons taught in ITAMITT? and taking them to the pulpit and pastoral setting?
Hey MPJ, did you only just read DoD or is this a review from an older reading?
I had to review DoD for Issues in Theology this year. I quite enjoyed it too. The drama metaphor was both the strength and weakness. He was so keen to pack as much as he could into it.
this is a review I submitted a couple of months ago for RTR so it should appear there soon...
Hi Mike,
I know that this blog's readers are a fairly educated bunch, but if you're going to use phrases like "epistemological" and "soteriological" would you mind providing translations into English for those of us who don't spend all day buried in theological texts? The thing I loved about this year's Moore College lectures (at least the one I attended) was that Dr Bray was speaking English, rather that theo-speak.
Regards
Roger
Sure!
epistemological = the theory of how we know stuff.
soteriological = the theory of how we get saved.
Thanks for the review - good to hear of solid books worth missing some other stuff I should be doing to read!
I read Is There a Meaning in This Text? and really enjoyed it. I like the sound of someone working hard to marry theology and pastoral concerns.
Cheers,
Keith B.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your review of Drama of Doctrine.
I wanted to comment on one of the criticisms you made of the book in your review...
You said:
"In particular, the pastor as ‘director’ (Part IV) feels like a poorly chosen equivalence and smacks somewhat of clericalism. Surely it is the Spirit who directs the church."
However, on p.32 of Drama Vanhoozer does recognise that the role of director is "reserved for the Holy Spirit and for those ministers the Spirit gifts and equips to be assistants"
Again on p. 244 Vanhoozer says:
"It is best to identify the Holy Spirit with the principle director of the Church. Pastors [...] are at best assistant player-directors."
I think its fair to say that in Drama Vanhoozer does indeed see the Holy Spirit (not the pastor) as Principle Director of the Church.
I'm not sure whether you've overlooked this or if you simply feel that Vanhoozer has not stressed the Holy Spirit's role enough in writing his book.
I'd be interested to know if you think that that the pastor as "assistant director" remains a poor equivalence?
Alex Abecina.
Hmm, fair enough! Thanks for those. I will have to check over the book and see if my whole point needs revising then.
Did this review ever get published in RTR?
I've just posted my own review here.
Thanks for the review, Michael. I was glad that you didn't just explain the points to agree/disagree with but also gave a brief synopsis of the book.
Post a Comment