Globalisation may be interpreted as a secular western liberal adaptation of a Christian vision. The linchpin of globalisation is a liberal view of market economies, so that trade barriers are minimized if not removed (as they were between Australia and the USA in 2004-5). Free trade can have the positive effect in small economies of breaking down the wealth and power of oligarchies in favour of the majority; which has the apparent effect of advancing western liberal values.
This of course worked in Eastern Europe, where religious life had been by and large suppressed; but has had limited success in the Islamic world. It was relatively easy to dazzle the citizens of the gray cities of the communist bloc with consumer goods and so to turn them against their governments. As President George W. Bush’s 2005 inauguration address revealed, the emancipatory master narrative of freedom is also being applied globally (and, ironically, by force if necessary). Globalisation means, in reality, the universal application of liberal values. Human fraternity – a secular catholicity – will be achieved in the end because Western culture is assumed to be the universal – or, at least, the universally desired – civilization. This is a soteriology without an eschatology: in other words, the ‘end of history’ is to be proclaimed from within history. In other words, what we may readily observe with secular western liberalism is a secular form of post-millennialism.
7 comments:
Like a utopia?
Ironic, then, that many pro-market people attack socialism for being too concerned with a utopia - they present one too.
Just look at Ayn Rand. Yuck!
As O'Donovan rightly comments:
"One difficulty of this approach is to match the high moral pretensions of this narrative with the prosaic realities of electoral democracy as we know it... There is something slightly ridiculous about talk of the dignity of human personality which comes to rest in a slip of paper" ...and, dare we add, an iPod.
Yes, the ipod is a point... you need to say something about the critical role of technology - it is our hope and strength, our guiding (flourescent) light, and the very means by which we grasp this 'globe', the embodiment of liberal eschatology.
The thing with utopias - everyone sees the other system as utopic. It's a fairly indiscriminate criticism...
The ipod is the opposite of the internet, isn't it? It is the disconnection of the individual from others, and the complete victory of choice over every other consideration. No listening to those naf album tracks anymore...
OSO: yes, secular liberalism needs to be called on its utopianism! And its romanticism about democracy...
Looks like you mentioned millennialism and so attracted the attention of secret rapture.
Speaking of which, globalisation attracts its own secular pre-millennialists (without the hope, just the doom). Peak Oil anyone?
Sure does! If PO didn't exist, you would have to invent it...
Post a Comment