Introducing - an important course offered to fourth year students at Moore College!
Shapers of Contemporary Protestant Theology is a reading and seminar style course which seeks to give the student an orientation to current themes and debates in theological thinking. This is in part at least to help the student conduct some self-analysis about their own theological thinking, its context and the influences on them. To do this, we will be narrating the story of Protestant theology in the last two centuries with special reference to four main thinkers: Schleiermacher, Newman, Warfield and Barth. Each of these thinkers is both an individual of immense and original influence on theological thinking, and also representative of (roughly speaking) 'schools' of theological thought within Protestantism. What is also of significance is that each of these thinkers is trying to do Christian theology in a faithful way in response to the modern world of the industrial revolution, the rise of the nation state, the Darwinian revolution in science, the politics of tolerance and charity and the inevitable progress of human culture.
Schleiermacher is of course the representative of the turn to 'feeling' and experience over and against the rationalism of Kant; Newman (who of course ended up as a Roman Catholic, but whose influence on Protestant/Anglican thinking is ongoing) turns to the church and tradition; Warfield is the orthodox Calvinist, and an American as well; and Barth represents the single most impressive attempt to reposition Protestant orthodoxy within modernity.
We see some themes beginning to emerge even from the planting of these four stakes in the ground. What is the place of academic theology vis a vis the church? What role can scripture plausibly have in modern theology after the fact of the rise of biblical criticism? What can theology say about politics in the modern world? What is the response of theology to the rise of science?
Here is the reading list:
Schleiermacher, F.
The Christian Faith. 1821. Repr. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1999, 52–93; 11–19.
Newman, J.H.
An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973, 93-178
Warfield, B. B.
‘The Church Doctrine of Inspiration’. The Inspiration and Authority of the Bible. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed, 1948. 105–165
Barth, K.
Church Dogmatics, I/1. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956, 125-186.
Church Dogmatics, II/2, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1956,145–194.
Moltmann, J.
Theology of Hope. London: SCM, 1967, 15–36.
Pannenberg, W.
from Revelation as History. London: Sheed and Ward, 1969, 123–158.
Gunton, C.E.
Father, Son, & Holy Spirit, London: T&T Clark, 2003, 3-18
Torrance, T.F.
"Theological Realism." The Philosophical Frontiers of Christian Theology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 169-96.
Wiles, M.
Working Papers in Doctrine, London:SCM, 1976, 1-17; 180-193
Packer, J.I.
“Hermeneutics and Biblical Authority,” Themelios 1.1 (Autumn 1975): 3-12.
Frei, H.
Theology and Narrative: Selected Essays, Hunsinger & Placher eds., New York: OUP, 1993, 94-116.
Lindbeck, G.
The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Lousville: Westminster John Knox, 1984), 73–90
Williams, R.
‘On the Unity of Christian Truth’ in On Christian Doctrine, Oxford: Blackwells, 16-28
Milbank, J.
‘Postmodern Critical Augustinianism’, in G.Ward (ed), The Postmodern God, Oxford: Blackwells,1997, 265-78
Horton, M.
Covenant and Eschatology: Divine Drama, Louisville: John Knox, 2007, 1-19
Vanhoozer, K.J.
The Drama of Doctrine, 1-30
Knox, D.B.
Selected Works, Vol 1, Kingsford: Matthias Media, 37-50, 73-95
Robinson, D.W.B.
Selected Works:Vol 1, Camperdown: ACR, 230-53
(about 550 pages in total)
9 comments:
I think Nietzsche may eventurally be seen as the most influrential Protestant theologian. Son of a Lutheran pastor, rabid excoriator of Christian orthodoxy and Pauline Christianity, oddly pro-Jesus though never admitting it. Imperfect in many ways but mirroring what Tillich called ultimate concern and making it impossible to "do theology" without acknowledging that we can know nothing beyond what we see and experience, and that even then we look at things differently.
Thomas Arnold (of Rugby fame) seems quite influential (especially if measured by High Church vituperation), although I'm not sure if his pedagogical focus renders him outside of your scope.
Looks good. Are you teaching by yourself or with Thommo?
Nup, with Dr David Hohne.
The 'Nietzche is the great theologian' schtick I have heard so often it has become a bit of cliche. He is certainly one the reference points for us.
Yes, it's a bit clichéd.
That will be a fun course!
Byron: a bad link there on clichéd. I guess you need to put in the full URL, not a relative one.
Oops, let me try again.
Got it, thanks. And a merry Christmas to you, BTW.
I assume this replaces the old shapers of modern theology course?
Post a Comment