I don't know Michael... It is not as is a single 'biblical perspective' exists, unless you are using obscure language to describe the process by which the canonisers brought together several, all-too-human texts with sometimes different and conflicting perspectives. I know you are a docetist who has never heard of word 'interpretation', but wouldn't it have been more honest to say that this book is from *your* perspective? Stop pretending that you are God. Thanks, mate.
9 comments:
Congratulations Michael. It looks good. I like the cover too.
I don't know Michael... It is not as is a single 'biblical perspective' exists, unless you are using obscure language to describe the process by which the canonisers brought together several, all-too-human texts with sometimes different and conflicting perspectives. I know you are a docetist who has never heard of word 'interpretation', but wouldn't it have been more honest to say that this book is from *your* perspective? Stop pretending that you are God. Thanks, mate.
Well that's just your interpretation...
;-)
Cool. Looks interesting.
Is it just me, or does it look like you just wrote the introduction? Like those books that have 'Foreword by Don Carson', etc.?
I don't get what you are asking...
This book doesn't have a forward (customarily written as an endorsement of the book by a great one).
It has an introduction, written by the author (not a great one) ie, me. From my perspective.
It doesn't have a foreword, either. But I liked the intro. Great idea to let us download it and read it.
Yes, not forward; foreword. Well, now you have read it... ... ... ?
:-)
Michael,
What I meant was that from the cover design, it looked to me more like the title & byline is:
"You"
([with] an introduction by michael jensen)
rather than:
"You: an introduction"
(by michael jensen)
So much so that I had to read on in the first place I saw it advertised to work out you actually wrote the whole thing.
Shouldn't that be, "You ARE available"...?
;-)
Post a Comment