In this brief sketch of the Old
Testament account of worship, we have been able to see something of the
distinctive pattern of the worship of Yhwh that made it distinct from the idol
worship of other nations. In particular, I have noted the pattern of response to the divine initiative in
specific acts and in the whole of life that characterizes the worship of
God’s people. The problem with my account thus far has been that I have
abstracted it from the history of Israel. The strong critiques of false worship
with which we began should alert us to the fact that something is still
incomplete in the account of worship given in the Hebrew Scriptures. Despite
everything, Israel’s life of worship became corrupted and diminished by the
failure of the people to attend to the distinctive characteristics of the
pattern of life they had been given. The final exile of Judah to Babylon was
surrounded by a flurry of prophetic activity in which Israel’s worship was
subjected to judgment and also promised a renewal. The most terrible disaster
of all was the utter destruction of the temple at this time, which meant the
end to the God-ordained worship at that spot. What would worship look like
without the temple and its ritual practices? This was a crisis of worship.
Ezekiel, for one, spoke of an extraordinary new temple with supernatural
dimensions – one that would, somehow, replace the one destroyed by the
Babylonians (Ez 40-48). The word ‘somehow’ is deliberately chosen: for while the
prophets foretold an intervention by God himself to restore the worshipping
community of his people and to judge his enemies, they were not specific on the
details. Isaiah spoke with poetic vigour about the ‘Servant of the Lord’ who
would suffer for the iniquities of the people (Is 40-66); and many prophecies
recalled the commitment of the covenant with David, that his line would be
everlasting (2 Sam 7; see, for example, Jeremiah’s emphasis on Davidic
kingship).
Even given the divine initiative
in engaging with people and the clarity of the pattern of response he demands –
homage, service, reverence – the human response is inadequate. This is the
point at which the New Testament claim is that in Jesus of Nazareth the history
of Israel finds its fulfillment. Jesus is, of all human beings, the one who
worships the God of Israel, the creator of heaven and earth, as he demands to
be worshipped – in purity and holiness. As the one human being who represents
not simply Israel but all of humankind to the Father, he in himself enables a
renovation of human worship. There is, following Christ, a significant
continuity but a substantial discontinuity with Old Testament worship.
The notion of Jesus as the true
worshipper is reflected across the New Testament, but finds itself refracted in
particular through the imagery of the New Temple and the declaration of a New
Covenant. In the light of these, the New Testament authors felt able still to
speak of the Christian life, individually and corporately, in terms that echoed
the ‘worship’ language of the Old Testament.
The disruption that Jesus’
ministry caused, which apparently led to his death, was chiefly caused because
he operated from within the temple as a strong critic of the contemporary
temple life. In Matthew, Mark and in John he is heard prophesying the
destruction of the temple and claiming that he can rebuild it in three days. John
in particular picks up the language of God’s presence and his glory, which is
so indicative of what the Israelites expected from the tabernacle and the
Temple: ‘And the Word became flesh and lived among us, and we have seen his
glory, the glory as of a father's only son, full of grace and truth.’ (John
1:14) Jesus takes the prophetic vision of the new temple and, extraordinarily,
shows how he himself realizes that hope in his life, death, resurrection and
ascension. The temple as the location for the encounter between God and his
people is, in Jesus, relocated. In him, the need for sacrifice to prepare the
people for meeting God is obviated. The source for the renewal and restoration
of Israel and by extension ‘all the families of the earth’ is now Jesus himself
– which is the prompt for the inclusion of the Gentiles. Engaging with God is
now mediated to human beings in the person and work of Jesus Christ; which in
turn shows that the temple was merely of foretaste of what has now appeared in
human history.
At the same time as he is the
means through which people are to come to worship God ‘in spirit and in truth’
(John 4) it is also the case Jesus has become himself the worthy object of
homage. I hinted previously that this is, in many ways, the most difficult
theological problem that the New Testament authors have to face. How is it that
a strict monotheism such as Judaic faith can give birth to, or be held to pave
the way for, a faith in which veneration is offered to (apparently) more than
one divine person? And yet, the heart of the New Testament gospel is the
declaration ‘Jesus is Lord’, a statement of homage that ascribes an authority
to him that only a divine person deserves (Romans 10:9, 1 Cor 12:3). The New
Testament answer is to speak about Jesus’ unity with the Father (Eph 4:4-7, 1
Cor 8:6).
Jesus also portrayed himself and
was portrayed as the inheritor and fulfillment of the pattern of covenantal
relationship with God, which stretches back to Abraham. As with the temple, the
ministry of Jesus was felt to be a critique of the law by his opponents, and
they took great offence. Yet a more careful reading of his words and actions
show him to be a skilled interpreter and advocate of the law. He was not
rejecting it; he was rather meeting its requirements and transcending it. He
was, he claimed, inaugurating a new covenant (something promised in Jeremiah’s
prophecy – Jer 31:31-4). At the Last Supper, he made explicit the link between
his sacrificial death and the notion of a new covenant (language picked up in
Heb 9:14-5) – pointing thereby to what worship would now mean: namely, that he
would make true worship of God possible by means of his atoning blood, and that
he would thereby by the focus of the homage of the new covenant people.
No comments:
Post a Comment