Thursday, January 24, 2013

The consequences of Christian worship




God’s people are able to pay homage to him as a result of their union in Christ, who cleanses them by his blood and leads them in adoration of God. They are enabled to worship God because God has gathered them together and given them his name. They submit to him as Lord in listening to his Word and seeking to encounter him there. Their adoration of the triune Lord is to be reflected in whole-hearted and sacrificial service of one another – spiritual acts of worship, now in Christ pleasing to him. In succeeding chapters we will examine in turn the various components of Christian worship – preaching, prayer, music and the sacraments – reflect the theological reality of the church as a worshipping community. 

For now, I shall take the opportunity to explore three substantial implications of Christian worship. The first of these is the edification of God’s people. In 1 Corinthians 14, which is one of the few passages of the New Testament in which church meetings are actually discussed, Paul connects the gifts of the Spirit with the ‘building up’ of the body. The gifts are given for that particular purpose, such that the gathering of God’s people ought to be ordered accordingly:
What should be done then, my friends? When you come together, each one has a hymn, a lesson, a revelation, a tongue, or an interpretation. Let all things be done for building up. (1Co 14:26)

Ephesians 4 is the other passage with a similar concern. ‘Building up’ has the sense of the maturing and strengthening of the whole, particularly (in Ephesians 4) in unity. The leadership offices of apostle, teacher and so on, are (once more) provided for this purpose. As the believers meet together in the fellowship of the Spirit to engage with the Father by the blood of the Son they are built up, collectively, in love for one another (Eph 4:16). 

The second consequence is that Christian corporate worship is a political. As Professor Bernd Wannenwetsch from the University of Aberdeen puts it:
In the celebration of worship the congregation is transposed into a particular social order…Christ is the head of the Church, and the life of the communities of his people follows the law of his Spirit. In this respect it is inescapably political – aligned towards the recognition of the good that comes from God, towards the common exploration of the good in the world and towards the common exploration of that good in shared action.[1]
Wannenwetsch makes the strong case that in the celebration of worship Christians become a social order of a particular kind: the body of the risen Lord. Life in this community is definitely ruled - that is, by (the word of) its Lord. It then has a pattern of life that it learns in response to this rule. The Spirit of God gathers the congregation which then pays homage to Jesus specifically as Lord in its common activities. It is at this point that the political dimension in Wannenwetsch’s scheme arises: this particular sharing forms a specific kind of community in which ‘believers find their basic political existence’.[2]
 
The gathering of the Christian community in worship has a specifically political character; it is the formation of a political form of life. This runs counter, of course to the contemporary secular view that seeks to privatize faith as ‘spirituality’, and specifically to de-politicize it. The experience of membership in the church with all it entails must inevitably (as it has historically) inform the Christian’s citizenship - over against the totalizing claims of liberal society if necessary. As Wannenwetsch puts it rather provocatively: ‘if worship is their form of life, Christians are exemplary citizens’ (p. 359).

Gathering together in the name of the Son of God, Christians foreshadow the final rule of God in Christ. This immediately relativizes the absolute claims of worldly powers – and frequently this is seen by them as a threat. The court tales from the book of Daniel are a case in point – stories that were frequently cited by the martyrs of the early Christian era. For example: the great image of gold set up by Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 2 is set up as an object of religious worship, but the political ramifications are clear. This is the tyrant’s statue, and refusal to worship his statue is not simply blasphemy but treason. When the three young Jewish men, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, refuse to worship the statue because of their exclusive commitment to worship the God of Israel, the rage of Nebuchadnezzar reveals how threatened he is. This is a challenge to his supreme authority because it is a refusal to acknowledge it. 

In all kinds of ways, the practices generated by Christian worship form a new, redeemed way of being a people. Since Christ is Lord, human authority is seen as derived from him and ultimately subject to him. Since Christ is Lord, we learn to live a life rich in thanksgiving and generosity. Since Christ is Lord and we participate together in him, we learn what suffering for another’s sake means. Since Christ is Lord, we learn that ethnic and class distinctions do not form the measure of humankind. These are all directly political lessons that spring from Christian worship.

The third ramification of Christian worship is mission. Christian worship is missional. As I have already indicated, worship is a communicative or expressive act. It expresses the allegiance and submission of the worshipper to the worshipped one. Christian worship, enabled by God himself and empowered by the Spirit, is not simply for the sake of God’s pleasure. It exists as a testimony to call those who do not yet worship. 1 Peter 2:9-10 is instructive:
But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God's own people, in order that you may proclaim the mighty acts of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. (1Pe 2:9)

In this verse, Peter, applying as he does the categories by which Israel was described at Sinai (‘a kingdom of priests’ Ex 19:6), casts the new covenant people of God in the role of those whole who proclaim the mighty acts of God to the world. Just as they had once existed in darkness and non-identity, so now they speak of the glory of God to those who are without hope in the world. They are ‘priests’ in the sense that their form of life mediates God’s character to the outside world, and they become in their form of life the location at which those far off may now be drawn near. By observing their form of life the nations are to be led to pay homage to God:
Conduct yourselves honorably among the Gentiles, so that, though they malign you as evildoers, they may see your honorable deeds and glorify God when he comes to judge. (1Pe 2:12)

The worship of God’s people, directed to the God who saved them and made them what they are, takes place in and before the watching world. It has a secondary audience. The great acts of God are rehearsed not simply for his sake but for the sake of those who have never heard them told.


[1] Bernd Wannenwetsch and Margaret Kohl, Political Worship : Ethics for Christian Citizens (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 9.
[2] Ibid., p. 7.

No comments: