I think one of the great things about the list that Justin generated of the strengths of Anglicanism is that it shows that Anglicanism has the possibility of becoming aware of its own weaknesses. Inbuilt in Anglicanism is the possibility of its own ongoing reformation. It is not beholden in an unrepentant way to its own traditions. This is more difficult for Roman Catholics and for non-conformists, I think, whose identity is more to do with a specific ecclesiology. Yes, that's one of the funny things about Anglicanism: it is (or ought to be) quite pragmatic about ecclesiological matters, in fact (read Richard Hooker to see this) - and what a relief it is too! You know, that is partly why Anglican Evangelicals are even 'lower' church than many Baptists and Presbyterians. Because, if you are a Scriptural Christian, then you can't possibly hold to Anglican church order as the only possibility!
There are some weaknesses worth exploring, however. I think Anglicanism's attachment to an Impirical political vision has yet to be repented of. There is a kind of superiority complex that Anglicans have which is inherited from the English superiority complex. We barely notice it until non-conformists point it out! We are just used to be the church of establishment. Even in Australia, where we are NOT the church of establishment, we act as if we are.
Let's be fair: the British Empire was one of the more benign empires of world history. And Anglican Christianity often ameliorated the rapine capitalism that drove the unprecedented conquest of territory. If you believe in Providence, as I do, then God used even British greed to spreed the gospel to the nations. And the Anglican Communion is perhaps the last vestige of that Empire, apart from the Commonwealth Games. Perhaps you could add to that the dominance of the English language globally, I guess.
Anglicanism, as the church of respectabilty and establishment, has a tendency to elitism and intellectual snobbery. It also licences aestheticism and nominalism. The political liberalism of the contemporary Church of England is not different in style to its former conservatism: it is still very much an establishment politics, a politics of respectability.
Because of the its links to government, too, it has aped the bureacratic structure of liberal government, and has imported its managerialism.
2 comments:
Dear Michael,
Spot on. And I especially agree with your point about ecclesial pragmatics. Church polity, alas, helped splinter Puritanism. It's surprising how little is to be found on this subject in the NT. What, after all, is a deacon? Hard to know. And is there really a "ruling elder"? I don't think so.
God bless,
Marty.
There is a kind of superiority complex that Anglicans have which is inherited from the English superiority complex.
Made me think of this, which a friend keeps on his blog.
Speaking of feeling superior: shouldn't it be "imperial" in the previous sentence?
And on a more substantial point, if Anglicanism is semper reformanda, why don't the XXXIX Articles provide for their own revision?
Post a Comment